SIMON SCHAMA'S ROUGH CROSSINGS A REVIEW

Historians like to tell stories, true stories that spring from the materials that have survives from the past. Putting the events together in a seamless web of narrative involves great intellectual and physical effort. And when you read a really good historical work based on exhaustive archival research you get the feeling of drifting into another world altogether. That is why someone said:The past is a foreign country. The twentieth century has seen a number of great historians: Fernand Braudel,Lawrence Stone, Bernard Bailyn, Theodore Mommsen and Simon Schama. Of these Theodore Mommsen won the Nobel Prize and still remains the only historian so honored. He was a historian of the Roman Empire who shiofted thefovcus of research from the Empire to the Provinces. He wrote in a polished and sophisticated style that probably was considered literary by the Literature Committee of the Alfred Nobel Foundation. Thomas Mann was also a good writer and his son Golo Mann has certainly inherited his father's gift for words. The stories that historians tell about the past are regarded as true stories because the characters spring from a whole skein of written and unwritten evidence, not testimony. Unfortunately is a moment of self destruction probably evven of self delusion, historians began neglecting the basic features of thie craft in favor of abstractions like "models" "causation" "hypotheses" personification of historical epochs as "feudal" "capitalist" etc.The result was a general impoverishment of the art of history writing. Then came Hayden White who even said that history is only a "construct" like any other discourse.

The sad state of affairs did not last long. Historians soon realised that a discipline that has been around for nearly 3000 years cannot be swept aside from the intellectual herotage of mankind. The craft of writing history not only involves a commitment to truth, no matter how elusive it may be but also the ability to write in a style free from the vacuous jargon that clutters the pages of several journals. One historian who has stood apart is Simon Schama.

Trained in the University of Cambridge Simon Schama teaches at tColumbia University. He is the author of Landscape and Memory and Embarassment of Riches.He has just published another excellent book, Rough Crossings.

The American War of Independence is usually seen as a gigantic struggle against oppression and an epic saga of liberty and freedom. This patriotic interpretation cannot be cynically set aside for the simple reason that all the participants in that struggle, Washington, Jefferson, Adams and Franklin were all influenced by the dominant intellectual ideas of the time that we now collectively call the Enlightenemnt. Yet the principle of human equality was not present in the minds of those patriots and leads to an obvious paradox: The Americns faught for their freedom and the Slaves in the US at that time faught on the side of the British. This point is ably brought out by Simon Schama in this book. After the defeat of the English and after the surrender of Cornwallis many of the slaves who faught on the side of the British escaped to Nova Scotia in Canada.

In fact conservative English judges who were called upon to deliver judgement on the status of slaves who escaped in British ports ususally set them free while liberal ideologues were less fortright in accepting the theory of monogenisis. Simon Schama has documented in great detail the lives of several slaves who faught and died in the American War of Independence.

It is a tragic fact of historyu that the triumph of the rebels meants postponing the freedom of the African American population. This book is worth readin.

IRAQI WOMEN AND CHILDERN SUFFER THE MOST

The embedded journalists from the USA and UK are doing a great disservice to their own people by consciously hiding the untold suffering of the people of Iraq in the face of American occupation. The impact of the war and the insurgency have been devastating on women and children. It is really sickening to see fat well fed Iraqi men, Quislings all of them, appear on Western TV and mouth innanities about the great job that is being done by the coalition. The pictures from Basra put paid to such extravagance. The Western media used to foment identity politics in Iraq between Sunnis and Shiaas, were quite unpreparted to see Shiaas out on the streets dancing over the burnt out sheell of the RAF chopper. The British troops retaliated with excessive force and killed 15 children and women. The Western media admits only 5 killed in the ensuing carnage.

The truth from Iraq is bitter and it is the truth of Auchwitz, Dachau and Triblinka. A holocaust is unfolding in Iraq and it is the women and children who face the brunt of it. Every night after sundown the US and their Iraqi collaborators invade the homes of people, especially Sunni homes, and in the pretext of searching for arms ransack and humiliate the people living there. Any Sunni male between 15 to 50 is carted away and several times their dead bidies turn up in the fieds around Bagdad. An unwriteen policy of ethnic cleansing in underway and the US administration is complicit in several acts of gfroos human rights violations. The US Media engaged in innanities over Rumsfeldt and the CIA has neither the time nor inclination to highlight the real situation in Iraq. The safety of the Green Zone does not permit the luxury of seeking out the truth.

The void is noaw filled by film makers who with home video, cell phones, handy cams,webcams and the like are documenting the atrocities that the USA and UK are inflicting on innocent Iraqis. Most of these film makers hide their identity as they fear both the Americans and the Insurgents who are alternatively support the US coalition or operate on their own. Children from the age of 6 suffer the psychological trauma of seeing their parents killed in front of their eyes. Symptoms of body tremors are becoming common among choldren. It is of course well known that involuntary body tremor is a sure sign of nervous breakdown. Women who have lost their husbands are being forced into prostitution in order to feed their children left fatherl;ess in a cruel and violent Iraq.

Travel from one city to another is becoming difficult because the Americans have put up road blocks everywhere. The only escape route is the desert and even their when groups are found crossing the desert they are strafed by US military helicopters. The people of Iraq have been turned into targets fror US and UK moilitary machine. One of the film makers has done a short and chilling story of a 8 year onld girl who was picked up by the American marines in the desetrs outside Baghdad. Her father was killed by the marines and the little girl herself was held for nearly 6 months by the marines until her Grandfather was able to track her down and rescue her. All the while the child was forced to view photographs of corpses and identify them. Such abuse of choldren is becoming rampant in Iraq today and are war crimes like any other.

The fact is undr Saddam Hussein women dad made great progress towars economic and social equality. The US occupation of Iraq is forcing women back into the hijab and the fact is the Americans are in alliance with Shiaa clerics who are forcing such reggressive measures.Link

KAAVYAA NEEDS ANOTHER CHANCE

What can you say of a girl of nineteen who took a single false step. That she is young. That she is ambitious. That she took a short cut to fame. Yes, you can say all this about a young Harvard sophomore called Kavyaaa Viswanathan, She is the only child a doctor parents who trained her from childhood to enter the portals of a great institution of higher learning--Harvard. She is by all accounts a bright, well groomed sophomore. Unfortunately for her her book, How Opal Mehta Got Kissed, Got Wild and Got aLife which was published recently by Little Brown and Co has strirred by a hornet's nest of intellectual property right issues. Simply put issues referred to as plagarism.

A few weeks back the Harvard Crimson published a story saying that Kaavyaa had lifted certain passages from another young adult writer Megan McCaffert's novels Sloppy First and Second Helping. A perusal of the two books does suggest similarities in language but there is no passage that is a straioght lift from either book. Kaavyaa has stated that she had read the two books by McCaffert and had "internalised her language". She issued a public apology and her publisher Little Brown and Co withdrew all copies of the book. I managed to get a copy as I live in a different country and even here the distributors are withdrawing all copies of her book. Kaavyaa received an advance of 500,000 US $ and she was forced to return that amont. Personally speaking I feel that this young girl has been punished enough. Her name and reputation in tatters, Kavyaa should now be left to purue her studies.

The alarming part of this entire sequence of events is that Harvard University is seriously considering action against her. We do not know what the Deans and Professors of Harvard have in their minds. But this I know that 19 is too tender an age for ones's life to be irrevocably damaged. I appeal to all those concerned to have mercy on that girl. Punisher her if you will. But dont for God's sake damage her forever

USA,IRAN AND NUCLEAR ISSUE

More tham 45 years ago Dr Henry Kissenger wrote a book which is more relevant today than it was in 1958 when Harvatrd University published it. Entitled [I]Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy[/I]this book argued the provocative thesis that the Westphalia System of having the State with its monopoly on the coercive power represented by the army and the like will not be the sole determinant of foreign policy in the nuclear age. Any state attempting to change the international status quo will perforce take the route to nulearisation. Unfortunately these insights seem to be forgotten by the very neocons whose short sighted and blindly aggressive foreign policy has led the USA to the quagmire of Iraq. Francis Fukuyama has come out strongly against the neocon agenda in his latest book. How then are we (thinking individuals) to proceed.

First, is Iran in violation of the Nuclear Non Proliferation Treaty. Honest opinion is rather divided on this question. Most agree that Iran did hide part of its research program from the UN watch dog agency. However, nuclear enrichment is not prohibited by the NPT. Therefore Iran is on solid ground on this issue.

USA agues that nuclear enrichment is a threat to the region. One look at the map will explain why Iran is furiously in favor of nuclear enrichment: Iran is ringed with a whole aray of nuclear powers"India, Pakistan, China and of course, Israel. Further the USA has forwars bases equipped with short and long rane nuclear tipped missiles at Qatar, Iraq, Turkey, Uzbegistaan and certainly Afghanistan. In such a geo political situation it is highly unrealistic on the part of the USA to expect Iran to give up its programme. This is precisely what Dr Henry Kissenger had pointed out in that brilliant book with which I began this blog. The is an undercurrent of racism in the nuclear debate that politie opinion does not quite address. The fact is that Anglo Saxon countries have enjoyed the near monopoly of the use and deployment of nuclear weapons and have shown the willingness to use shock and awe against non white peoples of the world (Iraq being the most recent victim). In such a scenario no amount of sabre rattling by Bush abd the Bushmen is going to help. Unfortunately, the USA keeps harping on the Al Qaeda factor and as far as the acqusition of the bomb is concerned even Muslim states will not permit non state actors like Alqaeda to acquire the nuclear weapons. This fundamental point is not understood by the present US Administration.

Does the USA hope, realistically speaking, to attak Iran and get away unscathed. The country has not forgotten the horrors of CIA sponsored coups and countercoups during the long years of the Shah's reign. THe unkindest cut of all: yes let me remind all of you: THE USA ARMED AND ENCOURAGED SADDAM HUSSEIN DURING THE TEN YEAR WAR WITH IRAN IN WHICH US SUPPLIED CHEMICAL WEAPONS TO SADDAM HUSSEIN. With such a background and history is Iran ever going to consider the USA a dis interested party. Rigtly or wrongly Iranians feel that the USA is creating a climate for a war using the same sort of bogey created around Iraq during the run up to the War three years back. The world has not forgotten the fact that the USA shot down a civillian passenger plane belonging to Iran killing more than 200 passengers on board. Iranians are familiar with the vacuous noises from Washington DC and it is extremelu unlikely that they will take US threats seriously. The world knowns that USA will not attak a nucleatr power and hence the Iranians aspire for nuclear capacity just short of weaponisation. See how Bush and the Bushmen are silent over NOrth Korea.

There is another factor. There is another undeclared nuclear power in the region and no one can be insensitive to Iranian fears that that power which has with impunity violated UN resolutions is capable of doing the bidding on behalf of the US establishment.

The fact is that the Iranians cooperated with the American in their war against Afghanistan and also gave tactical support during the offensive against Saddam Hussein. Iran was in an economic crisis a few years back but thanks to the soaring oil prices the Iranians are well on the way to economic recovery."

On Reading Simon Schama

When I was in graduate school several years back the most impressive historiographical works we were expected to read wad Orientalism by Edwars Said and of course, Metahistory by Hayden White. Those were diffent days. History was still regarded as a way of apprehending the real world in all its complexity. Narrative was only a menomic tool to ensure that the chronological ordering of events is in the framework of what was called causation. Intellectual history meant situating ideas in their historical contexts an understanding that is today regarded as passe. These are post modernist time and the simple language of historians trying to understand the real world has been replaced by a hugely comple and bewildering range of jargon terms which do not make any sense: they foreground instead of gioving importance, they privlege instead of telling a straight story.

Therefore it was simply wonderful to read Simon Schama who has writtten Landscape and Memory. This book is written so well that I was able to read it from cover to cover in one weekend. Schama speaks of the varied ways in which humans have coded their landscape both in paintinngs and literature. The fact is that our relationship with our landscape is being constasntly redefined and in that process we become more aware of the strong ties that bind us to our land.

America at the Crossroads: Fukuyama again

A powerful neoconservative voice has risen against the prophet of neoconservatism--George Bush. Francis Fukuyama, known all over the world for his provocative and yes, celebratory thesis about the end of history, has written a withering attack on Bush and the betrayal of the neoconservative agenda. The carapace of ideas such as preventive war,benevolent hegemony, war against terror are analysed and critiqued in great detail in thois booik. When the Iraq Qar was attacked on humanitarian and strategic grounds the neoconmen retaliated with sarcasm and felt that humilisating the messenger was enough to discredit the powerful arguments against the direction USA was tsaking as a consequence of neocon ideas of unilateralism and shock and awe.We may recall that Francis Fukuyama was an ardent supporter of the Iraq war and when he starts lamenting the horrendous cost of the wat even neocons must take note.

Traditionally conservatives trace their intellectual legacy to Edmund Burke and have always opposed overseas expansion and entangling commitments, a phrase we even find in the speech of George Washinton. Preemtive war and war to build democracy argues Francis Fukuyama render American foreign policy hostage to extra political interests. History cannot be accelerated through American agency, he writes. Like the Communists of old, the neoconmen too believed that they were on the right side of history and the chosen instruments of American destiny in the poist USSR world.

The major contribution of Francis Fukuyama lies in his treatment of the decision to wage war in Iraq without the approval of the UN. The main justification for the war the weapons of mass destruction allegedly possessed by Saddam has turned out to be a mere will-o-the whisp. Indeed the standing o9f the only superpower has taken a huge blow due to the false case made out by the neoconmen to justify the war. The foreign policy establisment seems to have been side lined and neocon thik tanks and ideologues like Paul Wolfowitz created the blue print for the war without a broadbased national debate over crucial issues. As Fukuyama maintains the US armay was woefully ill prepared for the war and did not expect the resistance. Those of us who have been following the war from a different perspective knew that the real challenge lay after the fall of Bagdad,

This book must be read by everone interested in Iraq.

Why is the Moslem World Angry

A few weeks back a Danish newspaper published a picture of Prophet Momammad, peace be on his name. The cartoon showed the Prophet wearing a bomb in his turban. The Moslem world was just aghast at this irreverential portrayal of the Prophet. Since then the fires have been raging in Lebanon, Syria, Egypt, Pakistan and Afghanistan. The Western embedded media says that it is a clash between Freedom of Expression and an increasingly intolerant Islam. This view is wrong because there are laws in all Western countries against Blasphemy and Racism. No one can claim the right to publish a cartton dishonoring Jesus Christ and claim that freedom of rxpression protects him/her. Therefore the principle of Freedom of the Press or ERxpression is not involved. The Wesrern Media is claiming unto itself the Right to dishonor Islam in the name of Democratic Freedoms. As Oliverm Wendell Holmes once said. you cannot shout fire in a crowded theatre and then claim that the act and its consequenes are covered by the First Ammendment. The present case is similar.There is a strong feeling in the Islamic world that the West is trying to undermine Islam as a religion and civilization by constantly depicing it as a fundamenmtalist, aggressive, lawless force. The anger that is spilling on to the streets is a spontaneous expression of the frustrations that people feel when their sacred symbols are cynically violated.

THE LESSONS FROM HISTORY: IRAQ AND THE WAR IN PHILLIPINES

has become fashionable to call the USA an empire. Whatever the term may mean to radicals and conservatives the fact remains the both groups do not see the present international overreach of the USA as imperial. I have some trouble accepting such generalities because they obcure certain hard ground realities. A better mway of phrasing the question would be: Does the USA have the stamina to be an imperial hegemon of the 21st century. With the war in IRAQ going nowhere and no exit strategy in sight, the daily body count increasing to catatrophic levels and the public acceptance level of Bush and his Bushmen decling by the day, a look at the history of the USA is in order. Consider the following points made by Niall [pronounced Niel] Ferguson in his Colossus:The Rise and Fall of the American Empire:Impressive military successA flawed assessment of local sentimentstrategy of limited war and gradual escalation of forcesdomestic turmoil over the unpopular and nasty warpremature political settlementdeclare victory and withdawSounds familiar. No we are not speaking of the Vietnam War. Afterall that war has still searing scars left to heal. We are referring to a much older war, one that is barely remembered.In 1898 American forces won a striking victory over Spain.The pretext for the war, like the WMD in the case of Iraq, was the accidental explosion in the battleship Maine. How could Spain be responsible for the explosion, is any body's guess. Mckinley, the then President spoke in words that would credit Bush and the Bushmen:I walked the floor of the White House night after night until midnight....I went down on my knees and prayed Almighty God for light and guidance..and light came..(1) We could not give them back to Spain(2) That we could notturn them over to France or Germany our commercial rivals in the orient (3) They are unfit to govern themselves(%) There is nothing left to sdo but educate, civilise and Christianize the Fillipinos...Thus the evangelical rhetoric of Bush II has precedents in US history.The fact that the USA completely underestimated the Resistance led by Emilio Aguinaldo. The War to "pacify" Phillipines was a costlt war and American tactics in the Phillipines bears recall of what is happening in Iraq; Read what the General officer Commanding of the US Forces in the Phillipines, General Jacob Smith ordered his men:"I wish you kill and burn the more you kill and the more you burn the better you will please me... I want all persons killed who are capable of bearing arms. Max Boot The Savage Wars of Peace: Small Wars and the Rise of American Power, New York 2002. pp.120.The point is that the rhetoric of freedom, civilization and democracy is only a smokescreen for what was an aggressive war based on perceived self interest. The Iraq war is no different."

Will the USA Repeat the same mistake in IRAN

George Bush II famously described Iran as part of the "axis of evil". Since then the situation with regard to Iran is perilously close to war. Had the ground reality on Iraq been different, there is no doubt that Bush and the Bushmen would have exported their version of "freedom and democracy" to Iran. Now that the USA is bogged down in an ever widening spiral of violence and destruction and the average mortality rate has increased to 7.5 soldiers per day and the average death toll amongst the civilians is 35 per day. This figure only means that any move on the part of the Bush administration to invade Iran will not have domestic political support. In any case US unilateralism only means that "international law" and "public opinion" account for so much nuisance value. There is no doubt that Iran is aggressively pursuing an uranium enrichment program whose only riason d'etre is the nuclear bomb. In fact by waging a brutal war of aggression on Iraq on the pretext that Iraq is on the verge of possessing the ABS weapons claim since disproved, the USA has provided legitimacy to every lawless regime to insure itself against the mindless American assault by brandishing nuclear weapons. In fact the non proliferation regime has now virtually collapsed due to US intervention.Now it is really a sobering thought that only 5 million Sunnis are inflicting unacceptable levels of damage to US troops. Just imagine the hostility of 70 million in Iran. Further, the Shia population of Iraq will not support an American invasion of Iran.The run up to the planned war on Iran is as stale as yesterday's news. First plant storied in the free-embedded media that Iran is developing the Atomic bomb and then selectively leak alleged links with Al Qaeda and then go to town with planted stories about oriental rulers who have no sense of responsibility. The pattern is distressingly familiar: Serbia and Iraq now Iran.The Bushmen have learnt one lesson from Iraq. They have learnt that in ground combat the US faces heavy odds. Hence the new game will be to use the shock and awe of areal bombardment.The show goes on.

Did Tookie Williams deserve to die

On December 13, 2005 a few minutes past mid night a well built, healthy man walked the last few hundred feet between his cell on Death Row at San Quentin and the excecution chamber. That Tookie Williams was a ruthless killer no one denies. That he had a violent youth in which a dissipated life careened out of control uder the influence of poverty and drugs too no one denies. He along with Raymond set up a violent street gang, Cripps, this too is a fact. And he killed four people in typical gang land style. Having said all this can we say that he deserved a chance to straighten out his lfe.I do not buy the theory of procecutorial misconduct during the course of the trial. That he was responsible for killing four young men is certain.After his trial, Tookie Williams had embarked upon the worthy course of warning Black youth of the dangers of gang warfare and drugs by writing a series of books. He also wrote his autobiography which explains the social context in which he grew up. A fatherless childhood and two children from two different women by the time he was 18, and an irresponsible attitude towards his children, made him seek the refuge in a gang. The gang is probably the one social group that provided a degree of self worth and then the drift into crime.It is not quite right to disscount the race factor in the debade on the Death Penalty. Tookie Williams was probed fro nearly 1 hour with hypodermic syringes before the vein to let the lethal mixture was found. This is ceratainly a cruel and unusual way of killing an individual, Further it took Mr Tookie Williams nearly 10 minutes to die. Some agony.The federal jusdes had reccomended clemency for Tookie Williams on the ground that he had behaved in an exemplary manner in the last half of his life. He died at the age of 52 for a crime committed at the age of 24. Obviously he was a completely different man to the callow youth who had done the horrible deeds.Can this factor not be the ground for mercy?

Did Tookie Williams deserve to die

On December 13, 2005 a few minutes past mid night a well built, healthy man walked the last few hundred feet between his cell on Death Row at San Quentin and the excecution chamber. That Tookie Williams was a ruthless killer no one denies. That he had a violent youth in which a dissipated life careened out of control uder the influence of poverty and drugs too no one denies. He along with Raymond set up a violent street gang, Cripps, this too is a fact. And he killed four people in typical gang land style. Having said all this can we say that he deserved a chance to straighten out his lfe.I do not buy the theory of procecutorial misconduct during the course of the trial. That he was responsible for killing four young men is certain.After his trial, Tookie Williams had embarked upon the worthy course of warning Black youth of the dangers of gang warfare and drugs by writing a series of books. He also wrote his autobiography which explains the social context in which he grew up. A fatherless childhood and two children from two different women by the time he was 18, and an irresponsible attitude towards his children, made him seek the refuge in a gang. The gang is probably the one social group that provided a degree of self worth and then the drift into crime.It is not quite right to disscount the race factor in the debade on the Death Penalty. Tookie Williams was probed fro nearly 1 hour with hypodermic syringes before the vein to let the lethal mixture was found. This is ceratainly a cruel and unusual way of killing an individual, Further it took Mr Tookie Williams nearly 10 minutes to die. Some agony.The federal jusdes had reccomended clemency for Tookie Williams on the ground that he had behaved in an exemplary manner in the last half of his life. He died at the age of 52 for a crime committed at the age of 24. Obviously he was a completely different man to the callow youth who had done the horrible deeds.Can this factor not be the ground for mercy?

USA IS LAWLESS ONCE AGAIN IS IT TIME FOR WAR CRIMES TRIAL

Under George II, the regime now in place in Washington DC has become a law unto itself. Even rougue states like Libya and North Korea did not ever attempt the blatant violations of International Law that has become the norm under the Bushmen. USA is not a party to the Internation Criminal Court of Justice. This perhahs explains the studied impunity with which the Bush regime has trampled upon the very core values of the international order. The illegal war in Iraq and themwanton use of banned chemical by US troops together with the Abu Gharais Prison scandal have exposed the utter lackmof idealism in the conduct of US fopreign policy. Not that the world was taken in by the faniful rhetoric of human rights, and freedom bandied about by Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton. However a new depth has been plumbed in the present regime.The CIA has been caught running illegal,flights between Europe and the USA. THese flights were used to ferry suspected "terrorists" from Europe to the legal limbo of prisons located in US dependencies. It is well known that prisoners or for that matter any human being casnnot be transported across international borders without the explicit sanction of the host countries through which the men are being transported. In the exalted Blairdom of Tony and the goons of the Labour Party more than 200 such flights have landed and taken off. Now the little poodle has suddenly become wise and has started barking against his master: Tony Blair's "foreigh minister" has written to the Secretary of State Dr Condaleeza Rice asking for details about the "torture flights". My Lord we are shocked that our airports were being used for such nefarious purposes says Tony Blair feigning ignorance. It is quite another matter that by ignoring the American violation of British airspace, Blairdom has also violated the EU constitution. The USA uses euphemisms to gloss such terrible acts:"extraordinary renditions" describes the illegal transfer of prisoners to third countries wherein US torture experts can question illegally detained and captured prisoners. Even in the dark days of Nazi Germany such vicious acts were unknown. Germany's new Chancellor Angela Markel is likely to take up this matter with Rice when the Secretary of State visits Germany next month.Tony Blair claims that his regime was totally in the dark about what the US was up to. Even this poodle has begun to distance himself from the misdeeds of Bush and his Bushmen.Back to Iraq. Everyday the toll is rising and the much vaunted Iraqi security force is being dessimated in the barracks itself. Now it has been confirmed beyond a shadow od doubt that the US used White Phosphorous in Fallujah against unarmed non combatants. Pictures of burnt children have been published by a former US marine Jeff Englehart. The "embedded free press" does not cover war crimes in Iraq. In March 2005, the American army in house magazine Field Arillery gave specific details of the use of WP in Falujah. It goes without saying that the USA has violated the 1980 Convention on Conventional Weapons which bans the use of incendiary weapons like White Phosphorous. In the Rules of Engagemnet, an account of the Iraq war, the British general Tim Collins admits that he trained troops in the use of WP. Now Saddam may have used chemical weapons against the Kurds, however in the Falklands War, the Anglo Saxon troops used WP against the Argentinians.It has also come to light that in the shock and awe attack on Bagdad in Narch 2003, the US used 'napalm'. With the tide of revulsion rising against the atrocities of trhe Bushmen it is time to CALL THE TROOPS HOME.

CLINTON SPEECH ON IRAQ HE TOO IS RESPONSIBILE

a speech in Dubai, Bill Clinton declared that the Iraq War was a "big mistake". The speech was made in the context of rising civillian and US casualities in Iraq. Clinton by referring to the Iraq War as a mistake is obviously playing to the domestic Democratic lobby in order to gather support for the next Pesidential candidate from the Democratic party, who could even be Hiliary Clinton. Of course, a consumate politician like Clinton can paly politics and thetre is nothing wrong in that per se. However,he implies that he had no real responsibility for the happenings in Iraq. Hence I would like to set the record straight.First of all, Clinton gave unqualified support to the invasion of Iraq ibn 2003. As former president he cannot claim that he was misled by the false propaganda emanatinf from the White House. If the truth be told George Bush was only follwing in the path alid out by Bill Clinton during his twi terms in the White House.Second, Bill Clinton was primarily responsible for imposing the UN sanction regime on Iraq qhich resulted in creating a huge humanitarian crisis in Iraq. In fact half a million Iraqi children perished as a direct consequence of the ruthlessly inhuman sanction's regime of the UN. Clinton cannot escape the responsibility for that.Third, Bill Clinton along with the British Government subjected Bagdad to weeks of ariel bombardment in 1993. Further in 1998, he signed the Iraq Liberation Act which made regime change the ofricial policy of the US Governemt. On the pretext of allowing the UN Weapons insectors the protection for carrying out their task, Clinton ordered the bombing of Bagdad for 4 days. Need we forget the bombing of Kossovo which resulted in thousands of fatalities.Given the record of his Administration, Bill Clinton cannot really distance himself from the killing fields of Iraq. In fact it was his administration that laid the ground for US involvement and George Bush II blundered into the mess aided and abetted by the faulty intelligence.

USA USES BANNED CHEMICALS IN IRAQ

It is a delicious bit of irony that the ostensible reason for American invasion of Iraq remains the ABC weapons allegedly developed by Saddam Hussein. It has now become abundantly clear that not only was the intelligence with respect of the WMD program of the erstwhile President of Iraq flawed but there appears to have been what one senator delicately called "cherry picking ." So a savage brutal war was waged against a nation which was down on its heels due to the UN sanctions. The people of Iraq have been crushed under two oppressive regimes:One the warlord regime of Saddam Hussein and the "shoot and scoot"wild west regime of the Anglo-Saxon coalition troops. We have during the course of the last one year catalogued the awful story of the travails the ordinary Iraqi living outside of the Grren Zone is expriencing.USA is a signatory of the Geneva Convention which bans the use of chemical weapons. In fact one of the charges that the regime in Bagdad has levelled against Saddam Hussein pertains to the use of a chemical against the Shiaa population in the South of the country at the end of the I st Gulf War. According to the Reprt prepared by William R Brankowitz of the US Army Chemical Materials Agency, a classified document printed for private circulation with security clearance,the USA dumped 7,346 canisters of a banned chemical White Phosphorous in the Atlantic Ocean in order to comply with the Geneva Convention against the use of Chemical Weapons.. Along with WP 421,157 pounds of radiological waste and 20 drums of cyanide were sunk in the Atlantic Ocean btween 1962 to 1989.What is disturbing is the growing evidence that in thwe assault on Fallujah last year( extensively covered on our blog) the US troops used White Phosphorous against civillian population. Clincs in and around Fallujah treated hundreds of people including children with severe burns and lesions of the skin caused by exposure to the chemical. The patriotic "embedded journalists" who reproduce uncritically the lies dished out by the Bush and the Bushmen did not once report the use of the banned chemical in the American media. The world got wind of the use of the blatant violation of the Geneva Convention from the Italian Press.The Italian TV aired a documentary feature produced by Sigfrido Ramicci and Maurizio Torrealta where shocking visuals of the horrendous damage done by the indiscriminate use of WP are given.A web site called globalsecurity.org WP results in "painful chemkical burn injuries".This chemical burns the skin right up to the demal level and leaves the clothes intact. This is because the chemical is used as a highly lipis solution.The response of the US state department to this war crime has been as expected flat denial followed by the most fraudlent of excuses. The use of the WP for illumination of the battle field is permitted and so the State Department spokeperson claimed the WP was used only as a battle field illuminator. Even the US battle manual ST100-3 permits the use of WP only as a smokescreen. Yet in complete violation of its own Internation obligations, and with total inhumanity to the Arab population, the Coalition used banned chemicals in an illegal outlaw manner in an illegal war of occupation.Thinking Americans must write to their Senators and Congressmen asking for a bipartisan Inquiry into the conduct of the Fallujah assault.Link: globalsecurity.org

Terrorism In Jordan: The American Occupation of Iraq and its consequences

The exposion in the Hyatt Grand Hotel at Amman killed nearly 60 people and injured 300 more. The responsibility for the blast has been taken by Al_Qaeda in Iraq led by the illusive Abu Musab Zarqawi.The attack in Jordon itself is proof, if proof is needed, that the Al Qaeda is capable of pulling of spectacular terror attacks in the region. Jordon has been a key ally of the US in its war of occupation in Iraq. Infact the utility of Jordon is more direct as far as US war efforts are concerned:"security personel" from US and other parts of the world brought into Iraq on conttract transit through Jordon. Further, Jordon is the only country in the region, apart from Egypt, to sign a peace treaty with Israel. There is also a demographic reason for the growing unrest in Jordon:more then half the population otf the country is Palestenian and was born in refugee camps where the living conditions are appaling.American occupation of Iraq has converted Iraq into a strong base for the Al -Qaeda. The violence has now begun to spill into Saudi Arabia, Jordon andmbelieve it or not even Iran. The American bombing of Fallujah (reported extensively on this blog) provided just the opportunity for Al Qaeda to reorganise itself and there is a steady influx of militants from the porous borders with Syria. A few years ago educated Islamic people may have scoffed at then very idea of the revival of the Caliphate. Now this concept has moved out of the sermons of mullahs in the mosques and is freely discussed in the cafes of Bagdad and Cairo which only goes to show athat the common man no longer regards the nation state as the center of his political loyalties.Another factor that is contributing to the groqing instability in the region is the American induced and encouraged Sunni-Shia divide. Iraqi society was essentially an interweave of Sunni, Christian, Kurdish and Shiaa communtities. This bond was reinforced during the decade Iran Iraq war, in which the USA provided every kind of weapon to Saddam Husseain. This age old tradition of amity between the different ethnic and racial groups has been undermined by American occupation. Identity politics encouraged by the occupying forces has made Iraqis extremely sensitive to primordial loyalties of sect and clan to the exclsion of other attributed of modern citizenship. The newly"ratified" Iraqi constitution virtually legeslates the exclusion of Sunnis from the political arena abd the Al Qaeda has found yet another grievance to espouse.The western media, the aptly named"embedded journalists" has not highlighted the fact that several Shiaa groups are being armed by the occupying forces as a prelude to eventual American withdrawal. The Freedom Guard is the most notorious of such groups. This group has been deployed against the Sunnis in Anbar province. American occupation has given the fuel to Islamic Terrorism

Civillian Casualities in Iraq

The highly respected medicak journal The Lancet that has been at the fore front of medical research for more that 150 yearshas in a recent issue highlighted the consequences of the American areal bimbing on Iraq using a sophisticated statistical technique called cluster analysis. The margin of error is less that 3% in most cases.The team looked carefully at the mortality figure reported in select households in the week immediately preceeding the Ameican bombing campaign in March 2003. This figure was compared to the mortality reported after the campaign to "liberate" Bagdad from the forces loyal to Saddam. The team from John Hopkins University found that by correlating the figure thus obtained over 33 neighbourhoods estimated that more than 100,000 civillians, of whom the large propotion happen to be non combatant women and children,had died as a DIRECT CONSEQUENCE OF ANGLO-AMERICAN ACTION.The unacceptable civillian casualities has made the World wonder whether the US Under George Bush has no qualms about inflicting death on unarmed civillians in the name of Freedom and Democracy.. George Bush spoke of winning political capital which he intends on the benefit of Americans. I would like to state the he has got this capital by wanton and callous bloodshed on a minumental scale.The report made public needs to be placed on the table of the Security Council and the opinion of the World raised againstsuch actions. It is of coursr not my case that the American political establishment be hauled before a war crimes tribunal.This will not happen and in 1945 the War Crimes Tribunal was set up only because Germany lost the war. More recentlyMilodovan Milosovisch was arraigned in the Hague only because he was militarily and politically defeated.However this does not negate the fact that atrocities and gross violations of the rules of combat are taking place in that insane and unneccessay war in Iraq and the world must protest.

GIRL BLOG FROM BAGDAD

I am an ardent blogger and have quite a few blogs posted in different web sites. I do not know why, but I do find the world of blogging extremely challenging. One goes to parts of the world one has only heard of, Bagdad for one. I read a particular blog form bagdad posted by a woman who calls herself riverbend, possibly she lives near the bend in the river Tigrios that flows through Bagdad. I have also been a keen advocate of peace in iraq and have done a lot of writing in my blogs on the atrocities of the US troops. However, I do not live in Iraq and my knowledge about what is happening in entirely from embedded journalists, whose reports are unvasrlnished American propaganda.

This brings me to riverbend. Her blogs are full of humour, not the dark black humour, but the humour that makes enduring the horrible nighmare of life in Bagdad bearable. She wries well, and I would even say that she is a stylish writer. There is no frenzied Yankee Get Out kind of reaction. She is much too educated for that. She records the sufferings of ordinary Iraqis who are outside the Green Zone who are trying to get by without losing their dignity and the compassion. I name RIVER BEND as the personality of the year who has brought the life in Bagdad within reach of people around the world.

I have read almost all her posts and have been touched by the simple and deliberrately understated manner in which she repotrs from the city of Bagdad.

is LORDS OF ALL THE WORLD A REVIEW

Historians have always had problems while dealing with large territorial empires and their raison d' etre for their very existence. The Roman Empire for instance claimed to have brought peace to a warring Europe, and formulated the concept of pax romana to justify is conquests. Edward Gibbon rightly said that the pretence of a free constitution was preserved with decent reverence, an acknowledgement that the ideological formulations of Vergil, Livy and Tacitus wre exactly self serving. More recently, Napoleon justified his ruhless war of expansion by claiming to be the inheritor of the French Revolution. And of course, we have the "white mans' burden" theory of the English Empire. Now the Americans have their own take on the imperial ideologies of the past by claiming that they advocate democracy and human rights the world over. As ideological formulation such statements are not subject to refutations and it does not matter that the USA ends up supporting the worst kinds of criminal regimes in the world.

Antony Pagden is a Professor ofn History at Johns Hopkins University and is one of the leading American historians of the Spanish Empire in the New World. His book Lords of All the World
is a classic study of imperial ideologies as fashuioned by the Christian Empires of the Eary modern period. How did the educated churchmen of the sixteenth century justify the expropriation of land and human rights of the Amer Indian population? How did Christian theology justify the acts of Cortes and his conquistidores?How was slavery justified using the theology of Saint Augustine? An answer to all these questions is found in the book.

Paul Volcker and His Report

After the end of the first Gulf War the United Nations at the instigation of the USA and other Western Powers imposed a most horrendous regime of sanctions on Iraq. Iraq was forbidden even to sell oil and as a consequence the quality of life and the civil infrastructure of Iraq virtually collapsed. It is well known that nearly 800,000 children dies prematurely because of the nobn availability of paracteamol, a drug that all take for granted. In these circumstances the UN decided to allow Iraq to export its Oil and import food, the program that came to be called Food for OUIl Program. The moneies gained by the export of Iraq oil was to be deposited in an escrow account maintained by the UN. So far so good. Then the likes of KOjo Annan, the son of the UN Secretary General, Kofi Annan, got on to the act and subverted a viable humanitarian program into a get rich fast scam in which the minnions of Saddam Hussain were accomplises. Shell companies were created and the Iraqi Oil Ministry at Bagdad assigned the right to lift and sell oil in the international market at a lower cost and the differnece in price to the tune of 50cents a barrel was deposited against the accounts of individuals in the Jordon National Bank.This was a scam waiting to happen and Paul Volcker has done a comendabel job in following the money trail and has perused 20 million documents in order to arrive at the truth. The fact is that some of the leading Third world politicians like Natear Singh, India's Foereign Ministeer seem to have made millions at the cost of starving and dying Iraqis. Ofcourse, no thief ever says even if he is caught with his finger in the till. even acknowledges that he is a thief. And the same with the like of Natwr Singh and his son Jagat Singh. There is now an outrage agaIst these clowns and they have been thoroughly exposed by Paul Volcker and his team.There is howeve a small problem. Paul Volcker in his interveiw with LA tIMES STATED THAT HE CHANGED THE LANGUAGE OF THE REPORT vis a vis Kofi Annan. I think that a splendid job was compromised by allowing this needless concession to Kofi Annan. The father claims that Cotecna, for which his son Kojo works obtained contracts without his knowledge. Given the way the UN system works this is impossible and Paul Volcker muist have nailed the lie of Kofi Annan,as the credibility of a truthful and accurate Report stands compromises as a consequence.

A New Threat to Blogging

Cyberspace is perhaps the last frontier of freedom. A new threat now confronts the blogging community. People are being procecuted for views and opinions expressed in their blogs. With the advance in technology, employers are in a position to monitor even the most private activities of their employees ans charge them with violation of company policy for opinions expressed in their personal blogs. Justice Wendell Holmes has defined the limits of the freedom of expression and as long as ablogger conforms to the Holmesian principle, it is illegsl to take action for opinion. Expression of a thought or opinion can never be a punishable offence in any democracy. Afterall, we are not living in an Orwellian world of "Thought Police".

The air hostess who was dismissed from her job because of what she posted on her blog deservesd public sympathy as she is a symbol of the right of free expression.